{
  "version": "1.0",
  "default_status": "Not assessed",
  "statuses": {
    "Verified": "The specific finding was corroborated by the recorded verification steps; scope and limitations remain attached.",
    "Supplier-reported": "The supplier states it; independent corroboration has not been completed.",
    "Inconsistent": "Identified records or claims conflict; show both and describe the unresolved discrepancy.",
    "Unestablished": "The evidence examined does not establish the claim; explain the search and access limits.",
    "Not assessed": "No assessment has been completed; no adverse inference."
  },
  "review_record": {
    "supplier_name": null,
    "domain": null,
    "reviewer": null,
    "conflicts": null,
    "scope_products_lots": [],
    "last_checked": null,
    "last_reviewed": null,
    "next_due": null,
    "published_on": null,
    "stale": null,
    "human_editorial_approval": null,
    "supplier_response": null,
    "corrections": []
  },
  "criteria": [
    {
      "id": "batch-match",
      "title": "Batch-specific COA and product match",
      "question": "Does the report identify the exact advertised product, strength, form and lot?",
      "evidence_expected": "Product URL and dated label image; lot/batch ID; report ID and dates; match or mismatch explained. A generic or historical report is not a current-lot match.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "authenticity",
      "title": "Laboratory and report authenticity",
      "question": "Can the laboratory and report be independently verified?",
      "evidence_expected": "Original report and verification URL/ID; laboratory identity; accreditation scope where claimed; verification date and method; supplier\u2013lab relationship. A logo or QR code alone is insufficient.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "identity",
      "title": "Molecular identity",
      "question": "What supports the exact compound, sequence and modifications claimed?",
      "evidence_expected": "Reported identity method, result and limitations; reference standard; full-length versus fragment; DAC and other modifications. Mass alone may not resolve all structural alternatives.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "purity",
      "title": "Analytical purity",
      "question": "What does the purity percentage actually measure?",
      "evidence_expected": "Method, chromatogram where available, integration basis, specification, result and method limitations. HPLC area percentage is not automatically mass fraction, identity or biological safety.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "content",
      "title": "Compound content and blend components",
      "question": "Was the advertised quantity of each compound measured?",
      "evidence_expected": "Analyte-specific quantitative method, units, uncertainty where reported and per-vial result; each blend component separately. Gross vial or powder weight can include excipients and is not necessarily active-compound content.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "microbial",
      "title": "Microbial testing and sterility claims",
      "question": "Which microbial or sterility claims are supported by which tests?",
      "evidence_expected": "Exact method, sample number, dates, specifications and results. A PCR microbial screen is not automatically equivalent to a validated sterility test. Absence of detected organisms has a defined sample/method scope.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "endotoxin",
      "title": "Endotoxin testing",
      "question": "Is endotoxin testing reported separately from microbial or sterility testing?",
      "evidence_expected": "Method, numerical result, units, detection/quantitation limits, tested dilution and product-specific acceptance rationale where supplied. Do not turn a result into a universal human-use safety threshold.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "contaminants",
      "title": "Other contaminants",
      "question": "What testing addresses relevant chemical contaminants?",
      "evidence_expected": "Heavy metals, residual solvents or other relevant impurities; methods, analytes, units, limits, results and sample/lot linkage. Record untested categories explicitly without inventing required universal panels.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "sampling",
      "title": "Sample provenance and batch coverage",
      "question": "Who selected and submitted the sample, and what does it represent?",
      "evidence_expected": "Supplier-submitted versus independently purchased sample; chain of custody; batch size/sample size; packaging and custody gaps. One tested vial cannot establish every shipment matches.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "stability",
      "title": "Formulation, storage and stability",
      "question": "What supports storage, shipping and shelf-life claims for the exact preparation?",
      "evidence_expected": "Formulation/route as advertised, packaging, stability study or other stated basis, conditions, dates and limitations. Ingredient data do not automatically validate a blend or finished product.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "claims",
      "title": "Advertised claims and regulatory context",
      "question": "Do claims match their cited evidence and the actual product?",
      "evidence_expected": "Dated claim/source pairs; study species, preparation, route and outcome; exact approval/accreditation assertions and primary-source check. Research-use disclaimers are not proof of human safety or regulatory compliance.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "business",
      "title": "Business and policy transparency",
      "question": "Can the operator and relevant policies be identified?",
      "evidence_expected": "Exact domain/entity where verified; contact and policy URLs; refund/shipping/recall and lot-traceability processes; discrepancies and verification limits. No publication of private personal details.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "independence",
      "title": "Conflicts and editorial independence",
      "question": "Could financial relationships affect this assessment?",
      "evidence_expected": "Reviewer/supplier relationships, gifts, compensation and sample funding; no paid rankings or compound-supplier affiliate incentives. Separate accessories commerce from review findings.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    },
    {
      "id": "corrections",
      "title": "Supplier response and correction history",
      "question": "Can findings be challenged and corrected with evidence?",
      "evidence_expected": "Dated question, response or no response as of date; supporting material; original conclusion and revision; human editorial approval; next review and stale status.",
      "status": "Not assessed",
      "access_result": null,
      "evidence": [],
      "finding": null,
      "limitations": null
    }
  ],
  "evidence_record_fields": [
    "claim",
    "product",
    "lot",
    "source_url",
    "accessed_on",
    "snapshot_reference",
    "sha256",
    "report_id",
    "report_date",
    "laboratory",
    "submitter",
    "sample_provenance",
    "method",
    "units",
    "specifications",
    "result",
    "verification_steps",
    "limitations",
    "reviewer_approval"
  ]
}